Mutual Funds Analysis - Why You Need to Know What is Really Happening Behind the Scenes
When investing in mutual funds, it is important to first carry out an analysis so as to come up with the most informed choice on which type to go for.
Analysis entails much more than just comparison of the different classes that exist.
It is a process that helps you a big deal in being sure that your funds are being managed as they should and that, you as an investor have the skill to correctly identify them.
Analysis of mutual funds looks at both the qualitative and the quantitative aspects of the funds.
If you are a keen reader of the newspaper, you will realize that they always give you a glimpse of what is happening in the stock exchange market on a daily basis.
However, this analysis may not be adequate to give you all the information that you so badly need as you try to make a choice between the different types of mutual funds there are.
This is because, what most of the financial journalists do is just report the current market trend without going into details of what is really happening behind the scenes.
You may need to go a step further and do a more derailed kind of analysis.
There are different approaches to mutual funds analysis and there are those commonly used than others and which are believed to lead to more accurate results.
For qualitative mutual funds analysis, the two basic approaches are the benchmarking and the end point analysis.
There are common mistakes that arise when these approaches are used, but with the right information at hand, you, as an investor can apply the methods and correctly come up with the right conclusion.
With benchmarking, the mistake that commonly arises is the fact that most analysts, for example the Morning star, tend to only concentrate on one aspect of the fund and in most cases, its performance.
Other aspects like the returns and price are ignored, which are the actual reflection of the funds manager ability.
To be more precise in results, it is advisable to take all these factors into consideration.
The other mistake that occurs in the end point analysis is that there is normally a lot of bias.
If you look closely and keenly through the newspapers on a regular basis, you will no doubt notice that most of the mutual funds whose reports are given are only those that are seen to be performing well.
When you look at cumulative statistics, you will realize that the funds that appear on the list are those that are thought to be performing at their peak.
This kind of analysis is misleading because there might just be another type of mutual fund which has not performed well in the recent past, but which has potential of doing well, yet it is not highlighted.
Analysis entails much more than just comparison of the different classes that exist.
It is a process that helps you a big deal in being sure that your funds are being managed as they should and that, you as an investor have the skill to correctly identify them.
Analysis of mutual funds looks at both the qualitative and the quantitative aspects of the funds.
If you are a keen reader of the newspaper, you will realize that they always give you a glimpse of what is happening in the stock exchange market on a daily basis.
However, this analysis may not be adequate to give you all the information that you so badly need as you try to make a choice between the different types of mutual funds there are.
This is because, what most of the financial journalists do is just report the current market trend without going into details of what is really happening behind the scenes.
You may need to go a step further and do a more derailed kind of analysis.
There are different approaches to mutual funds analysis and there are those commonly used than others and which are believed to lead to more accurate results.
For qualitative mutual funds analysis, the two basic approaches are the benchmarking and the end point analysis.
There are common mistakes that arise when these approaches are used, but with the right information at hand, you, as an investor can apply the methods and correctly come up with the right conclusion.
With benchmarking, the mistake that commonly arises is the fact that most analysts, for example the Morning star, tend to only concentrate on one aspect of the fund and in most cases, its performance.
Other aspects like the returns and price are ignored, which are the actual reflection of the funds manager ability.
To be more precise in results, it is advisable to take all these factors into consideration.
The other mistake that occurs in the end point analysis is that there is normally a lot of bias.
If you look closely and keenly through the newspapers on a regular basis, you will no doubt notice that most of the mutual funds whose reports are given are only those that are seen to be performing well.
When you look at cumulative statistics, you will realize that the funds that appear on the list are those that are thought to be performing at their peak.
This kind of analysis is misleading because there might just be another type of mutual fund which has not performed well in the recent past, but which has potential of doing well, yet it is not highlighted.
Source...